Comparison
Looker vs Metabase
Scored side by side on data-analytics, using the same criteria we apply across the category.
Governed BI built on a version-controlled semantic layer.
Open-source BI that non-technical users can actually operate without SQL.
Scored side by side
Semantic modelling
Self-serve usability
Governance
Embedding
Visualisation
Value for money
Looker verdict
The strongest governance story in BI. Only justifiable if you will genuinely maintain the semantic layer.
- Semantic layer ends metric disputes
- Excellent embedded analytics
- Version control brings engineering rigour to BI
Metabase verdict
The best value in BI for teams under a few hundred people. Add a semantic layer before metric disputes start.
- Non-technical users genuinely self-serve
- Free self-hosted edition is fully capable
- Fast to deploy and adopt
FAQ
Common questions
What's the difference between Looker and Metabase?
Looker: The strongest governance story in BI. Only justifiable if you will genuinely maintain the semantic layer. Metabase: The best value in BI for teams under a few hundred people. Add a semantic layer before metric disputes start.
Which has better reviews, Looker or Metabase?
Metabase is rated higher — 4.5/5 versus 4.2/5, from 3,400 and 2,800 reviews respectively.
Does Looker or Metabase have a free plan?
Metabase has a free tier ($0 self-hosted / $85 per month cloud); Looker doesn't (starting at Custom, typically $60k+ per year).