Comparison

Confluence vs Miro

Scored side by side on collaboration-docs, using the same criteria we apply across the category.

Confluence

Enterprise wiki with the governance, permissions and Jira integration large organisations require.

4.1(12,300)$0 / $6.40 per user / month

Miro

Enterprise whiteboard with the deepest facilitation and workshop tooling in the category.

4.6(9,400)$0 / $8 per user / month

Scored side by side

Integrations

Confluence

4.5

Miro

4.6

Value for money

Confluence

3.9

Miro

3.8

Confluence verdict

Choose it for governance and Jira alignment, not for the writing experience.

Scales to very large documentation estates
Excellent permission and audit model
Deep Jira interoperability

Miro verdict

Worth the premium for organisations that facilitate seriously. Everyone else should start with FigJam.

Unmatched facilitation feature set
Enormous template library
Strong enterprise administration

collaboration-docs

FAQ

Common questions

What's the difference between Confluence and Miro?

Confluence: Choose it for governance and Jira alignment, not for the writing experience. Miro: Worth the premium for organisations that facilitate seriously. Everyone else should start with FigJam.

Which has better reviews, Confluence or Miro?

Miro is rated higher — 4.6/5 versus 4.1/5, from 12,300 and 9,400 reviews respectively.

Does Confluence or Miro have a free plan?

Both do. Confluence starts at $0 / $6.40 per user / month, and Miro starts at $0 / $8 per user / month.