Comparison
Confluence vs FigJam
Scored side by side on collaboration-docs, using the same criteria we apply across the category.
Enterprise wiki with the governance, permissions and Jira integration large organisations require.
Figma's whiteboard for workshops, diagrams and early-stage collaboration.
Scored side by side
Integrations
Value for money
Confluence verdict
Choose it for governance and Jira alignment, not for the writing experience.
- Scales to very large documentation estates
- Excellent permission and audit model
- Deep Jira interoperability
FigJam verdict
The obvious whiteboard for Figma-native teams. Facilitation-heavy organisations should still evaluate Miro.
- Cheapest path to a whiteboard if you already pay for Figma
- Very low learning curve
- Seamless design-file integration
FAQ
Common questions
What's the difference between Confluence and FigJam?
Confluence: Choose it for governance and Jira alignment, not for the writing experience. FigJam: The obvious whiteboard for Figma-native teams. Facilitation-heavy organisations should still evaluate Miro.
Which has better reviews, Confluence or FigJam?
FigJam is rated higher — 4.5/5 versus 4.1/5, from 12,300 and 3,800 reviews respectively.
Does Confluence or FigJam have a free plan?
Both do. Confluence starts at $0 / $6.40 per user / month, and FigJam starts at $0 / $5 per editor / month.